Litton systems inc Somalia

McCann v. Litton Systems, Inc., 986 F.2d 946

McCann alleges that Litton Systems, Inc., ("Litton") forced him into retirement when he turned sixty-five years of age, thus engaging in unlawful age discrimination. A district court jury found for McCann and assessed damages at $246,000. Litton subsequently moved for judgment non obstante veredicto and, in the alternative, a new trial. The

AEROSPACE---Northrop Begins Integration of Litton''s Troubled

With its $5.1 billion acquisition of Litton Industries Inc. complete, Northrop Grumman Corp. now faces a far tougher and costlier task turning around three of Litton''s four operating units.

Litton Systems, Inc., Applied Technology Division

of 183 ALR-74 radar warning receiver (RWR) systems was awarded to appellant Litton Systems, Inc., Applied Technology Division (ATD) at the not-to-exceed (NTE) price ceiling of $131,734,780 by Warner Robins Air Logistics Center, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia on 3 December 1984. The RWR systems were to be installed in aircraft to

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 87 F.3d 1559

Litton Systems, Inc. (Litton) appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. After a jury verdict in favor of Litton, the trial court determined as a matter of law that Honeywell did not infringe Litton''s U.S. Patent No. Re. 32,849 (''849 reissue) and U.S. Patent No. 4,142,958 (the ''958 patent).

Ammunition Ship Photo Index

Click On Image For Full Size Image Size Image Description Contributed By / Source; USS Shasta (AE-33) 09053326: 111k: Launch of Shasta (AE-33), 3 April 1971, at Ingalls Shipbuilding Division, Litton Systems Inc., Pascagoula, MS.: Dale Hargrave: 2444k: Aerial view of USS Shasta (AE-33) under way in San Francisco Bay, July 1972. US Navy photo, File Name AE 33 July 1972 TH

LITTON SYSTEMS, INC. v. W | 728 F.2d... | 2d142311873

NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment entered on April 28, 1983, in which the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, after a bench trial, held valid a United States utility patent and a United States design patent, both owned by Litton Systems.

Gregory v. Litton Systems, Inc., 472 F.2d 631

Litton Systems, Inc., 316 F. Supp. 401 (C.D. Cal. 1970). It is stipulated that Litton''s decision not to hire Gregory as a sheet-metal worker was predicated upon his statement that he had been arrested fourteen times, and not upon any consideration of convictions, or of national security, the latter a point relevant to certain of Litton''s

Winchester Electronics Acquired by Audax Group

Audax Group today announced it completed the acquisition of Winchester Electronics ("Winchester") from Litton Systems, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, subsidiaries of Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC). Headquartered in Wallingford, Connecticut, with operations in the United States, China, Mexico, and Malaysia, Winchester designs and

Thomas Betts Corp. v. Litton Systems, Inc.

Thomas Betts Corporation ("T B") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that T B''s U.S. Patent No. 3,990,767 ("the Narozny patent"), issued November 9, 1976, for an "Electrical Contact and Connector Means Employing Same," has not been infringed by the manufacture and sale by Litton Systems

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.

These cases require that the accused design also appropriate the novelty of the claimed design in order to be deemed infringing. See, e.g., Litton Sys., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp., 728 F.2d 1423, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (originating the point of novelty test). But the Court noted that the separate point of novelty test has proven difficult to apply when the claimed design has numerous features

United States v. Litton Systems, Inc.

Litton Systems, Inc., 573 F.2d 195-198 (4th Cir. 1978). (6) April 6, 1977. A federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia indicted Litton for filing a false claim in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. (7) April 11, 1977. Litton entered a plea of not guilty and filed a notice that the case was potentially complex. The court set May 20th for a hearing

Litton Industries, Inc. -

The U.S. conglomerate Litton Industries, Inc. has endured one of the American business world''s most famous expansion odysseys. From its foundation in 1953 through the late 1960s, Litton''s annual sales grew from $3 million to $1.8

Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.

In November of 1967, Falcon Tankers, Inc. entered into a contract with Litton Systems, Inc. for the construction of four oil tankers. Litton thereafter contracted with Worthington Corporation to manufacture deepwell, self-priming, variable speed cargo pumps to be used to load and unload liquid jet fuel. One of the integral parts of the pumps is

Hall v. Clifton Precision, a Div. of Litton Systems, Inc.

Clifton Precision, a Div. of Litton Systems, Inc. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Jul 29, 1993. 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D. Pa. 1993) holding that conferences between witnesses and counsel are prohibited both during the deposition and during recesses. Summary of this case from Pastura v. CVS Caremark

Almost 40-years since the Litton Systems car-bombing

It will be 39-years next year when 11 people were injured in a horrific car-bomb that exploded outside Litton Systems Canada, blowing out a 50-foot section of wall at the Rexdale plant that produced radar-evading guidance

LN-3 inertial navigation system

LN3-2A Inertial Platform at RNlAF Electronics Museum, Rhenen, The Netherlands. The LN-3 inertial navigation system is an inertial navigation system (INS) that was developed in the 1960s by Litton Industries equipped the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter versions used as strike aircraft in European forces. An inertial navigation system is a system which continually determines the

LITTON SYSTEMS INC v. HONEYWELL INC (1998) | FindLaw

The United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment in Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 87 F.3d 1559, 39 USPQ2d 1321 (Fed.Cir.1996) (Litton I ), and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17, 117 S.Ct. 1040, 137 L.Ed.2d 146 (1997).

LITTON SYSTEMS INC v. HONEYWELL INC (1996) | FindLaw

LITTON MARINE SYSTEMS, INC.

企查查为您提供litton marine systems, inc.的最新工商信息、公司简介、公司地址、电话号码、招聘信息、信用信息、财务信息、法律诉讼等多维度详细信息查询,让您对litton marine systems, inc.能够做到全面的了解！

United States v. Litton Systems, Inc., 573 F.2d 195

28 U.S.C. § 2514; see S E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1, 1517, 92 S.Ct. 1411, 31 L.Ed.2d 658 (1972). Nevertheless, Litton was asked to forego a right as a price for the government''s termination of the investigation. Specifically, Litton was asked to give up its right to bar the Board''s reconsideration of its claims.

LITTON SYSTEMS, INC. v. WHIRLPOOL CORP

Plaintiff-appellee Litton Systems, Inc. ("Litton"), a Delaware corporation having headquarters at Minneapolis, Minnesota, brought this action against defendant-appellant Whirlpool Corporation ("Whirlpool"), a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Benton Harbor, Michigan. Litton alleged that certain Whirlpool microwave ovens infringed two

Almost 40-years since the Litton Systems car

By TOM GODFREY. It will be 39-years next year when 11 people were injured in a horrific car-bomb that exploded outside Litton Systems Canada, blowing out a 50-foot section of wall at the Rexdale plant that

United States v. Litton Systems, Inc., 557 F. Supp. 568 (S.D. Miss

Litton Systems, Inc. (Litton), indicted in April of 1977 for allegedly making a false claim against the United States government *569 (18 U.S.C. § 287) [1], has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment because of "inexcusable and prejudicial prosecutorial delay" and the "loss and destruction of exculpatory evidence." Litton contends that

II-VI Incorporated Acquires Litton Systems, Inc. Silicon Carbide (SiC

II-VI Incorporated today announced that it has acquired, via an asset purchase agreement, the Litton Systems, Inc. Silicon Carbide (SiC) Group. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

Sargent v. Litton Systems, Inc., 841 F. Supp. 956

Plaintiff Barbara Sargent brought this action in state court on March 10, 1993 against Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Industries, Inc., Dalmo Victor, Inc., General Instrument Corp. and unnamed defendants, alleging injuries arising out of the termination of her employment at Litton Systems, Inc.

LITTON MARINE SYSTEMS INC. in Chicago, IL

LITTON MARINE SYSTEMS INC. is an Illinois Corporation filed on November 5, 1986. The company''s filing status is listed as Revoked. The company''s filing status is listed as Revoked. The Registered Agent on file for this company is C T Corporation System and is located at 208 So Lasalle St, Suite 814, Chicago, IL 60604.

Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.

Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc., Del per., 355 A.2d 898, 908 (1976). After persuading Litton to use expansion joints rather than "O" rings to absorb flexing and to connect the pump column with the suction can, Worthington negotiated with Uniroyal for the purchase of the joints. Uniroyal''s engineering department told its sales

Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc. :: 1972

Falcon Tankers, Inc., a Delaware corporation contracted with Litton Systems, Inc., also a Delaware corporation, for Litton to design, construct and sell to Falcon a tanker to be known as the "Falcon Lady". The design was prepared by Litton

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell Inc., 238 F.3d 1376

MAYER, Chief Judge. Litton Systems, Inc. (Litton) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that Honeywell, Inc. (Honeywell) did not infringe Litton''s United States Reissue Patent No. 32,849 (''849 reissue) directed to a "method for fabricating

Quote for Part 7117028-1 by Litton Systems Inc

ASAP Aviation Procurement is pleased to announce that part number 7117028-1 of NSN 5950-00-116-3474 is now available and in stock. We can get you one of the fastest and most competitive quotes on this part. Part number 7117028-1 is a Transformer Power manufactured by Litton Systems Inc under CAGE Code 17863.

Litton Systems Inc. | Missouri Department of Natural

Electrical resistance heating treatment method used to reduce levels of volatile organic compounds in soil at the former Litton Systems Inc. site in Springfield, Missouri. The former Litton Systems Inc. site is located on approximately 70

Litton systems inc Somalia [PDF]

Solar Pro.